Multi-year monthly results
Since 2016 · $65k–$87k/mo
A documented, multi-year monthly track record — managed since 2016, not a one-off spike.
Summary
The supplied dashboard shows representative months: $87k at 37.5% ACoS in December 2016, $77k at 34.7% in January 2017, and $65k at 31.9% in February 2017. It is a limited historical snapshot and does not prove causation, continuity outside the shown periods, or another seller's outcome. Consumer DTC · US · 2016 → 2026 (monthly).
Measured outcomes
Historical result for this individual, anonymized engagement. Source and period are shown on this page and in the dashboard image. Results are account-specific, do not prove that one action caused the change, and are not guaranteed for another seller.
The months are the record.
Month after month since 2016, the same US consumer account has filed the same kind of result into the record — different numbers, same standard. Long runs strip the drama out of any single month: markets shifted, seasons turned, and the account kept filing months.
The operating cadence was monthly and it did not vary: the same hygiene and the same structure, applied again each month rather than reinvented each quarter. Branded defense and non-branded scaling kept their lanes so every month's numbers read cleanly on their own. Search-term review and negative-keyword harvesting ran on the same schedule throughout, and bids were managed to the account's targets month over month. The system was identical in year one and year ten; the months are what accumulated.
The supplied dashboard shows representative months: $87k at 37.5% ACoS in December 2016, $77k at 34.7% in January 2017, and $65k at 31.9% in February 2017. It is a limited historical snapshot and does not prove causation, continuity outside the shown periods, or another seller's outcome.
Want a case like this for your brand?
Start with the free audit, or book a 30-min call. Timing is confirmed after intake.